Category Archives: Politics

Walker’s Budget: Of Course It’s Bad For South Milwaukee

South Milwaukeeans: Get ready to feel the pain from Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed budget.

While we’re still sorting through all of the potential impacts of Walker’s plan announced Tuesday, it’s very clear that the governor has decided to balance the state budget on the backs of local governments (in addition to the poor, middle-class teachers and other public employees, unions and countless other constituencies who dared not support him during his campaign).

Does this surprise anyone? It shouldn’t.

My biggest objection: The further erosion of local control through new and ridiculous mandates on local communities from a governor who somehow claims to be in favor of smaller government while at the same time loves telling local leaders what we must do to govern local residents.

Among my biggest complaints with his hypocritical plan:

  • Shared revenue cuts. As expected, Walker is using cuts in shared revenue to local governments as a key part of his plan to balance the state budget, and why not? Passing the buck like this is easy. The average cut is expected to be more than 12 percent … which for us could quickly punch a nearly $400,000 hole in our budget. And it could be more. Just what will that mean for services in the short and medium term? Stay tuned.
  • Levy limits. At the same time he slices state aid to local governments, Walker wants to limit how much communities can increase their tax levies to fund the services facing the cuts. His proposal: Allow local governments to only raise property tax levies equal to the amount of new construction. For South Milwaukee, where new construction is almost non-existent, that likely means we will not be able to raise taxes at all going forward. Now, I’m no fan of large tax increases, nor could I see supporting one, but I stand behind the approximately 2% percent increases we’ve delivered in our last two budgets – fair and reasonable increases that reflect the fact that costs to deliver our first-class city services go up every year. In Scott Walker’s world, apparently there is no such thing as inflation.
  • Recycling. This is perhaps the most hypocritical part of Walker’s plan. He is proposing that the state no longer help local governments pay for their recycling programs – while removing the mandate that communities offer these programs at all. The state now provides South Milwaukee more than $120,000 for this purpose. Without it, we will likely have to pass on the full cost of our recycling efforts to residents, resulting in higher fees for this service. The alternative? Get out of recycling altogether, which simply can’t be an option if you at all care about the planet. Plus, we recently signed a long-term deal with Veolia to run the South Milwaukee recycling program, so that can’t happen anyway. When you see this increase on your bill, I ask you to remember that it is brought to you by a Republican governor who campaigned against higher taxes and fees.

Couple all of that with Walker’s “budget repair bill” — his attempt at killing public unions and providing so-called “tools” that likely won’t come close to closing the shortfall he would create with the three items mentioned above — and you have a terrible piece of legislation that will deliver nothing but pain to local residents.

And it will be painful. Count on it. South Milwaukeeans will see real impacts from Walker’s budget through cuts in services, and there is simply no way around it. Our budget is so tight already – our staffing so lean – that it is inevitable. I wish it weren’t, but it is.

Yet, it could be worse. I can’t even begin to get into the potential impacts of Walker’s budget proposal on local schools. That’s another post for another day.

But rest assured that our kids will feel the pain even worse than we will at City Hall thanks to Scott Walker’s “reform budget.” As the parent of a Rawson Elementary kindergartner and husband of an ESL teacher for the Whitnall School District, that scares the heck out of me.

7 Comments

Filed under Politics

What About the Rest of Us? A Word on “Faux Mandates”

On Jan. 1, Journal Sentinel colunmnist and respected local historian John Gurda wrote a column for the Sunday paper headlined: “Beware Faux Mandates: Other Politicians Through History Have Mistaken Election for Mandate.”

I can’t get that column out of my mind these days. Because it was so prophetic … and so right.

Gurda wrote:

Scott Walker is skating rather blithely on the same thin ice as Ryan. He defeated Tom Barrett 52% to 47% in November. That’s a five-point spread – decisive, but hardly a landslide.

Walker has to live – and govern – with the knowledge that nearly half the state’s voters don’t want him in the executive mansion, and that some of his loyal supporters disagree sharply with his opposition to high-speed rail.

True humility in his situation might suggest a conciliatory, consensus-building approach, but Walker has plunged ahead with the spotless conscience of the utterly convinced, a man forever untroubled by shades of gray. Acting for all the world as if he had a mandate, the governor-elect who won’t even hold office until tomorrow has already scuttled the high-speed rail project and cowed the Legislature into leaving the state employees’ labor contract on the table.

So, I ask: Where is the mandate? Where is undeniable support for making the sweeping changes Walker has already led since being elected, especially the union-busting legislation he is pushing through now?

If Walker had beaten Barrett 60-40%, or even 55-45%, that might be another story. But we are talking about five percentage points here — a closer race than many, including me, predicted. Five points. I ask again, where is the mandate?

Of course, Walker has strong support from his base on his so-called “budget repair bill.” The people who love Scott Walker love that he is out to essentially put an end to collective bargaining and, in turn, public sector unions. That much is clear.

But just how many people is that, exactly? Fifty percent of the state? Less? What about the rest of us? What about the tens of thousands of protesters who are showing up in Madison day after day to fight against this legislation (including Saturday)? Do their voices count here? Does my voice count?

Now, I’m not blind to the fact that, on the whole, there was a historic Republican wave in Wisconsin in the November elections. The governorship, the state legislature, a U.S. Senate seat and several Congressional races all turned over toward Republicans. I get that, although I argue this “throw the bums out” mentality will be the norm, not the excpection, moving forward in state and national politics, including 2014.

That said, even the 2010 election was no mandate, certainly not Walker’s disappointing showing against Barrett. I just wish Walker would stop treating it like one and, as Gurda writes, quit plunging “ahead with the spotless conscience of the utterly convinced, a man forever untroubled by shades of gray.”

Walker needs to compromise on the collective bargaining issue, as unlikely (impossible) as that is. 

But don’t take my word for it — listen to the more than one million people who voted for Barrett … and the countless others who may not have voted in November but, if the election were held today, would run to the polls to sweep Walker from office.

8 Comments

Filed under Politics

Economic Development Forum Set for South Milwaukee PAC

Milwaukee county executive candidates Chris Abele and Jeff Stone are among those appearing at a forum set for Wednesday, March 16, at the South Milwaukee Performing Arts Center.

The South Shore Forum on Economic Development begins at 6:30 p.m. and includes a roundtable discussion with local leaders and comments from Abele and Stone on key issues like the Hoan Bridge, transit, parks and 794 extension.

Learn more in this story on SouthMilwaukeeNow.com.

2 Comments

Filed under Politics

Divide and Conquer: A Losing Strategy for Local Governments, and Unions

Obviously, I’ve made my objections to the Republican plan to kill public unions in Wisconsin pretty clear, and I’ve tried to focus many of my arguments on its potential impact locally.

The decision to separate out police and fire employees from the benefit cuts and restrictions on collective bargaining may have the biggest impact of all.

For starters, exempting these groups seriously weakens the “tools” Gov. Scott Walker said he wants to give local governments to help offset the looming cut in state aid. Since spending on public safety employees is such a large part of our city budget, as it should be, not forcing them to pay more for benefits like everyone else will do little for the city when it comes time to making the hard choices with which we’ll be faced after the legislature is done here.

In other words, in choosing this path, Walker undermined a key point of his own reasoning for the “budget repair plan.”

(Of course, I have many other concerns with the reasoning behind the legislation that I’ve laid out on this blog.)

Also, think of the complexity this adds to the work of our administration, staff and others in negotiating different contracts for different unions, as well as managing completely different work rules and pay and benefits packages for different types of city employees.

Then there is the biggest reason of all to hate this: The “haves vs. have nots” discontent that can be bred when one city worker is working under different rules, and with a different pay and benefit structure, than another. This hurts employee morale and productivity. That in turns impacts city services.

How is that good for anyone?

Of course, this is clearly part of the Republican strategy here. It’s “divide and conquer,” pit one union against another with a clear endgame in mind: killing all public sector unions.

Indeed, police, fire and other public safety unions should not feel safe simply because they were spared the pain this time around. Walker is coming for them next as he continues his assault on workers’ rights and the middle class.

Thankfully, local public safety workers get this, and it’s a big reason why many of their unions did not support Walker in his election bid.

Milwaukee’s did. Many others didn’t, including the parent unions of our local workers. So I am happy to hear that they are standing side by side with their union brothers and sisters in Madison — and back home — as this struggle continues. Keep up the fight.

3 Comments

Filed under Politics

Democrats on the Run? More South Milwaukee Perspective on the Senatorial Walkout

Channel 4 stopped by AMF South Park Lanes on Tuesday to talk to area residents about the decision by 14 Democratic state Senators to leave the state in order to avoid a vote on Gov. Scott Walker’s “budget repair bill” and force a compromise.

Check out the story here. From it:

As 14 Democrats remain in Illinois, their constituents are taking sides. … One thing both sides agree on, they will vote based on how their senator behaved during the budget battle.

That, I believe, we can all agree on.

Also check out this coverage from Fox 6 on South Milwaukee’s State Sen. Chris Larson. His quote:  “This is the worst bill that’s ever been presented in the history of Wisconsin.” I can’t say that for certain, but I can’t remember a worse one in my lifetime.

4 Comments

Filed under Politics

South Milwaukee School Unions Ratify Contracts … and Wait

Five unions representing teachers and other employees of the South Milwaukee School District ratified new contracts over the weekend, Superintendent Rita Olson confirmed to me in an email.

Now they wait to see what will happen in Madison as to their future of their pay, benefits and collective bargaining rights.  

From the highlights Dr. Olson provided:

  • All steps given in the 2009-2010 and 2010-11 school years would be honored and individuals would not be required to move backwards to previously held salaries. 
  • The contract would have a 0 percent per cell increase in the first year and a 1.28 percent per cell increase in the second year. 
  • Effective July 1, 2011,  health insurance premiums would be increased to 9 percent or current law, whichever is greater.
  • There is also a cap on health insurance contributions for retirees, and staggered years of service to qualify for retirement health insurance benefits.

This sounds fair and reasonable to me … and a great example of what I continue to say in the debate over the governor’s union-busting plan:  Let local units of government (in this case, the school district) work with their unions to control costs and deal with budget pressures as they see fit.

State government should not force our hands, especially when it comes to what we can and can’t collectively bargain for with our workers.

To the governor and those in the Senate and Assembly: Accept the compromise proposed by Senate Democrats, which gives you the savings you need to help solve the state budget crisis and allows local governments to deal with looming shared revenue cuts.

I thought that’s what this was supposed to be about anyway. Isn’t it?

Of course, I know it’s not. I get it. This is first and foremost about breaking public unions and ending more than 50 years of collective bargaining with barely a debate — and no desire for any level of compromise. It’s about balancing the budget on the back of middle class workers. And it’s wrong.

14 Comments

Filed under Politics

Why I’m Pro-Union: Some Context …

Regular readers of this blog know that I’ve tried hard to play it straight, providing a comprehensive and unique news source for South Milwaukee without interjecting much opinion.

That is why I launched this blog, and that is what this blog will continue to be. Most of the time.

As you can see, this week has been different. I feel strongly about the issue of protecting union rights, and I feel a responsibility to use this pulpit to make that position known and respond to what I consider unfair and unwarranted attacks on public workers by our governor.

Why do I feel so strongly about this? I attribute some of this to my life experience.

A former union member myself, I am married to a public school teacher. My father is recently retired after a long career as a unionized social worker in the Wisconsin prison system. My stepfather is retired from the U.S. Post Office. My sister is a unionized social services worker in Walworth County. Also, my mother is a nurse at the veterans hospital and, while not a union worker, she benefits from a strong union there as well.

(And I assure you that none of my family members have gotten rich working as public employees. Far from it.)

Additionally, my position on this issue should not be a surprise to my constituents because I was endorsed by two unions in 2009 and made that clear in much of my campaign literature.

So, yes, I side with unions in most cases … and certainly on such a fundamental issue of preserving collective bargaining rights.

With that in mind, my position on unions has led some to surmise that I am as liberal as they come. I am not.

I’d like to think I am like most of America — liberal on some issues, conservative on some issues. I am conservative on many social and law-and-order issues, for instance, while liberal on others like commuter rail (a purely economic development issue for me).

I hate that everyone these days is labeled “liberal” or “conservative,” and it’s assumed they are, or must be, completely left-leaning or right-leaning all of the time and on every issue. That’s certainly not the case with me, nor many of the people I know.

Moreover, I like to think my vision for South Milwaukee is apolitical. That’s why aldermanic races are non-partisan.

Positive ideas for the future of this great city should appeal to liberals, conservatives and everyone in between. And I promise to continue to do my best to deliver them.

6 Comments

Filed under Politics

This is Amazing Video …

Check this video out from Wisconsin Eye, courtesy of the Wisconsin State Journal, showing just how eager Republicans were on Friday to strip 50 years of collective bargaining rights away from public workers.

How eager were they? So excited that they decided to move Gov. Scott Walker’s budget repair bill toward final passage without waiting for Democratic lawmakers to even enter the chamber and vote.

Amazing. Unprecedented. Insulting. Disgusting.

8 Comments

Filed under Politics

Compromise? Not with this Governor

Not surprisingly, Gov. Scott Walker rejected a compromise that would have delivered the budget savings he was seeking from public employees … showing once and for all that this whole debate is about union busting, and little else.

From the Journal Sentinel story:

“Gov. Walker has repeatedly said that we won’t negotiate the budget and we can’t balance the budget on a hope and a prayer,” Werwie said in the statement. “That remains true. State and local government need the flexibility to manage this and future budget crises. In addition, as government workers pay a modest amount toward their pension and healthcare premium, about half the national average, it is fair to give them the choice of additional savings on their union dues.”

Oh, so now the issue is more than just giving local governments the “flexibility” and “tools” they need to balance their budgets (tools we don’t need). It’s about giving public workers “the choice of additional savings on their union fees.” Sure.

Why can’t the governor  just say that he wants to end unions in Wisconsin? I’d respect him for admitting it.

5 Comments

Filed under Politics

A Common Sense, But Unlikely, Compromise …

Public employees, including teachers, will apparently agree to Gov. Scott Walker’s request of benefit givebacks if Walker and legislators agree to take the removal of collective bargaining rights off the table.

That’s according to State Sen. John Erpenbach, a Middleton Democrat, in today’s Journal Sentinel.

This is a fair, common sense compromise that should win the support of lawmakers. Of course, I highly doubt it will.

Walker and Senate and Assembly Republicans are out to bust the unions, plain and simple. What they’re seeking to do is about 10 percent “budget repair” and 90 percent sticking it to the unions. I just wish they would admit it.  At least that way it can be an honest debate.

At this point, both sides are so entrenched that compromise seems a distant dream.

2 Comments

Filed under Politics

No Surprise: Honadel Supports Walker’s Plan

I respect South Milwaukee State Rep. Mark Honadel.

I just happen to disagree, strongly, with his position on Gov. Scott Walker’s union-busting plan.

Honadel was quoted in a story on WTMJ-TV a few days ago. From it:

Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) could certainly hear the voices from his office, but they are unlikely to change his support for Walker’s budget plan. “They are going to pay a little more for their health care, but by golly, they’re still going to have a pension, unlike 80% of my friends in the private sector who lost their business or their company went belly up,” Honadel said.

Of course, a vote for Walker’s plan is more than just a vote for benefit givebacks (which I’d support). It’s also a vote to put an end to collective bargaining rights for public workers in communities across the state.

Walker told the Journal Sentinel in an interview on Friday that he is simply giving local governments “the tools to control their own budgets” and “flexibility” they need to deal with looming cuts in state aid.

He added: “I know as a local official, collective bargaining time and time again was the thing that stood in the way of local governments and school districts being able to manage their budgets.”

Really? We’ve managed our budget just fine while preserving collective bargaining rights. Now, it’s not been entirely pain free, but we’ve done it.

We did for the past two years with the help of our public safety unions, who, recognizing the financial situation of the city, agreed to no pay increases in 2010 and a 2 percent pay increase in 2011, as well as increased health insurance contributions.

And we’ll do it again in 2012 … hopefully with the partnership of our unions. Unions are not the problem. They can be part of the solution.

3 Comments

Filed under Politics

What Others are Doing to Stand up for Public Employees … and Against Union Busting

Common Councils across the state are preparing resolutions against Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to trivialize unions while at the same time cutting pay and benefits for public workers.

Check out a roundup of resolutions from the League of Wisconsin Municipalities here. And expect to see more added to this list in coming days and weeks.

It’s especially interesting to see others raise the same primary concern I do: The loss of local control and local say in how we negotiate with our unions. This should be something we decide, not Madison politicians.

As I’ve said, I don’t have major issues with the governor seeking givebacks on pay and benefits from unions, as long as they are negotiated. And many union workers, I’ve read, are in agreement.

My complaint, like the complaint of others, is with over-reaching to also strip unions of their rights going forward. Walker and Republican lawmakers have no business ramming that type of bill through the legislature in a matter of days.

5 Comments

Filed under Politics

Why I Disagree with Teacher Sickouts

As you can read below, I support the move by Democratic state Senators to boycott the hyper-speed, fast-tracked, ram-it-through debate going on in Madison around Gov. Scott Walker’s union-busting plan.

I do not support teacher sickouts. It is wrong, hypocritical in fact, for teachers to argue that the ongoing debate is about the future of education in Wisconsin … and then hurt students by keeping them out of the classroom.

That gets to my point about unions. I support a lot of what they stand for, but certainly not everything, and certainly not all of the tactics they use. This is one of them.

One alternative solution: Go to work, do some informational picketing before and after school and during lunch hours , and then head to Madison once the bell rings. That’s what teachers in some districts are doing, and that’s the right call here.

Keep the doors to school open. As the parent of a Rawson Elementary student, I am glad to see class is still on in South Milwaukee.

2 Comments

Filed under Politics

What Do You Think of the Union Proposal Before the Legislature?

I want to know what you think of Gov. Scott Walker’s plan to restrict collective bargaining rights for public workers and reduce their benefits as part of his budget repair bill.

I’ve added a new poll on the right side of this page. Cast your vote!

2 Comments

Filed under Politics

The South Milwaukee School District’s Reaction to Walker’s Union Busting …

Update: School Superintendent Rita Olson has informed me that the School Board did indeed approve contracts for five of its unions on Wednesday. The deals still need to be ratified by each union. I will keep you posted when I get more details.

The South Milwaukee School Board is working to approve union contracts with teachers and other represented employees ahead of new restrictions on organized labor coming soon out of Madison.

Check out the Journal Sentinel story here. From it:

In South Milwaukee, Superintendent Rita Olson said her school system does not have a tentative agreement with its unions yet, but she hopes the board might be able to make offers that would be accepted by all of its employee bargaining units at the Wednesday meeting. She said the sides have been negotiating for a long time and are not far from settling anyway.

“We want to offer a voluntary settlement before everything goes into effect,” Olson said of Walker’s proposal.

School administrators have been told that Walker’s changes would go into effect immediately and affect any unsettled contracts.

I am anxious to see what kind of contract settlement is reached, if one is at all. I will keep you posted.

In the meantime, I commend the district for its willingness to work with its union employees in the 11th hour to get a deal done that I’m expecting will be fair. It goes back to the crux of my argument on this issue: Let local units of government decide what’s best when it comes to how they bargain with their unions and what they bargain for.

Let the School Board and school unions, in this instance, hammer out a contract how they see fit.

There is simply no room for the governor and state legislature to get involved here … except, of course, when the goal is to decapitate public sector unions, which is Scott Walker’s ultimate aim in this whole charade.

4 Comments

Filed under Politics