Category Archives: State Budget

Standing Up For Local Control

I enjoyed presenting at the South Milwaukee Education Association’s state budget forum on Tuesday, and I want to thank the more than 80 folks who turned out (and the organizers who invited me).

It was an informative discussion and debate that I hope was a learning experience for attendees. It certainly was for me, thanks to the dialog throughout the night.

My message? It’s the same one I’d deliver to any crowd, liberal or conservative: Municipalities share many of the challenges school districts do. We feel the same pain when it comes to spending what it takes to deliver the services taxpayers expect and deserve.

State mandates make this more difficult than ever. Simply, I hate being told what to do, and it needs to stop.

This was the focus of my remark Tuesday.

The state has enough problems of its own than to inject itself into what should be local issues like how much we can raise in property taxes or where our city workers can live or what we can and can’t negotiate with our public employee unions. Indeed, those three examples — levy limits, residency restrictions and Act 10 — are mandates that impact what we do as a city every day. There are others.

All taxpayers feel this to some degree.

Consider levy limits.

The state limits how much communities can raise in property taxes in a given year, essentially capping levy increases at the amount of new local construction. And in an already-developed city like South Milwaukee, that has been around 1 or 2 percent, or less, in most years – barely inflation, if that. In other words, for a city that runs as efficiently as ours, doing more with less already, the state has made it difficult to fund even the same level of services year over year.

Costs go up … but how can you factor those in when your budgets can barely grow?

So we continue to do our best, making do thanks to the hard work of our city employees, from the administration to the front lines, dealing with the day-to-day ramifications of legislation authored and decided by politicians 90 miles away.

Am I arguing to raise taxes? Of course not. I’m proud of the low-levy-increase budgets the City Council has passed in recent years, and we need to continue that focus on frugality.

My point, instead, is this: No matter where you stand on any of these mandates – and I actually favor some of the more recent ones, including relaxed residency and Milwaukee County Board reforms — these should be local issues, decided by local leaders.

I hope we can all agree on that.

There seemed to be strong agreement on Tuesday night, when I left attendees with a request to get involved.

How? Contact your legislators, and the member of the Joint Finance Committee, as they hammer out the 2013-15 budget details. Let them know where you stand on key issues in the state budget – issues like public education funding and the state mandates that have their biggest impacts on the local level.

Become part of the debate at the local level, too. Attend a city council meeting or three. Learn the issues. Vote. Post something on NOW. Even comment on this blog. Stay on top of the key issues facing our city … and make your voices heard.

1 Comment

Filed under State Budget, State Lawmakers

Dollars And Sense: State Budget Is The Topic Of May 28 Forum

The South Milwaukee Education Association is hosting a public forum around the state budget on Tuesday, May 28.

The event starts at 6:30 p.m. at Papa Luigi’s, 1919 12th Ave. in South Milwaukee.

Experts on school program and funding will lead a discussion of key issues in Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed budget, including a potential funding freeze and voucher expansion. I’ll also be providing my perspective on how the state budget impacts South Milwaukee.

Learn more here. Hope to see you there!

Leave a comment

Filed under State Budget

Good Turnout, Informative Debate At South Milwaukee’s County Board Restructuring Meeting

An estimated 200 people attended Milwaukee County Supervisor Pat Jursik’s public information meeting on proposed Milwaukee County Board restructuring legislation — and I’m glad I was one of them.

I found the event informative, as it provided a deep dive on the Assembly and Senate bills calling for a referendum to reduce the role (and pay) of supervisors to part-time, reduce the board’s operating budget (i.e., staff) and transfer some powers to the county executive, among other changes.

The point-counterpoint debate between Rep. Joe Sanfelippo, the former supervisor and author of the Assembly bill, and Supervisor Theo Lipscomb Jr., who spoke out against most of the proposals in the legislation, was also lively and thought-provoking. And the question-and-answer/comment section added to the meeting as well.

I left the South Milwaukee Performing Arts Center much more educated on this important issue — as did Pat, who pledged to take all that she heard into consideration in formulating her opinion on the issue of county board restructuring.

I credit Pat for once again showing her commitment to keeping constituents informed on key issues, and for taking a measured approach to her approach on this topic. I also thank the two panelists for the robust debate — and having the courage to sit in front of a room of 200 people and argue their case.

Both had reasonable and strong arguments for their positions, and I left feeling like the best solution — as it so often is — is somewhere in the middle … somewhere between the status quo and the sweeping changes proposed by Sanfelippo.

Of course, I’d like to know what you think. Here is the presentation from the meeting. Read it … and vote in my new poll!

1 Comment

Filed under Milwaukee County, State Budget, State Lawmakers

Educate Your Lawmakers: South Milwaukee School Leaders Want Your Help In Speaking Out Against Walker’s Budget (And For Public Schools)

Update: Vote in the new poll!

Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed 2013-15 budget is not a pretty one for South Milwaukee schools — and the district wants you to contact local legislators and other lawmakers to tell them about it.

From a memo posted on the school district website

The Governor’s budget for 2013-15 is yet another reduction to K-12 public education, in a period where there is over $1.7 billion of new funds available to allocate in the state budget. 

  • The Governor is proposing that the available funds in the State budget be allocated to expand the number and cost of voucher and charter schools in Wisconsin – this money reduces the amount available to public schools.
  • The Governor has allocated a 1% increase in state aid to K-12 education, but this is NOT ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR SCHOOLS. This is only a property tax reduction. The Governor must allow school districts to increase the revenue limit. An increase in revenue limits enables schools to sustain programs whereas the state aid in the Governor’s budget is only going to provide property tax relief.
  • Tell the legislators that public schools need a per pupil increase to the revenue limit.

The upshot? The South Milwaukee School District would face a more than $365,000 budget deficit if Walker’s budget passes. That would surely mean cuts for a district that has already dealt with more than its fair share.

Preliminary budget recommendations are expected on March 20. In the meantime, hopefully the state funding scenario will improve — although I certainly have my doubts.

It’s clear Gov. Walker and many Republicans have decided to place their bet with voucher schools … and not with public education. As the proud parent of two Rawson Elementary students, I think that’s wrong. Fix public education. Invest in it. Fund it properly. Don’t encourage its demise in favor of a voucher system that has yet to demonstrate results (and may never do so).

You can learn more about the district’s budget plight on this page on its website. As you do that, I think I’m going to call my legislators … and I encourage you to do the same.

16 Comments

Filed under Schools, State Budget, State Lawmakers

Helping Local Governments: Larson Proposes Bill To Restore Recycling Funding

State Sen. Chris Larson, who represents South Milwaukee, has introduced a bill that would restore $26 million to the state budget to fund local recycling programs.

Click here to learn more about the Recycling Funding Restoration Act. 

As I’ve written about, the 2012 state budget does South Milwaukee and numerous other communities no favors when it comes to recycling, as it cuts funding for these programs while at the same time keeping the state recycling requirements in place.

In other words, it’s yet another unfunded (or not adequately funded) mandate from the state that we have to deal with on the local level — at a time when we’re already seeing shared revenue and other funding cuts.

Restoring this funding, such as recycling itself, is the right thing to do, and we must find a way to fund these programs. I hope the state steps up and does its part.

Leave a comment

Filed under State Budget

Finally, Reason Reigns on Recycling

So, it looks like Gov. Scott Walker has changed his tune on taking away the recycling mandate. Now, the question … how much state support will communities receive to perform this valuable service?

Check out the Journal Sentinel story here. From it:

Key Republican lawmakers have said Walker went too far, and late last week, the DNR and a group of solid waste and recycling organizations traded proposals on how to manage and fund recycling in future years.

The organizations want to keep the program and funding at its current level and not see state recycling money used for other purposes.

The DNR laid out options that would maintain some level of recycling. Communities received $29 million in subsidies in 2010, which on average pays for about 25% of their recycling programs.

If the subsidies were eliminated, recycling might end in some locales. But experts say because of the popularity of recycling, communities would deal with cuts by charging or raising garbage collection fees or reducing service levels. …

Deputy DNR Secretary Matt S. Moroney said the DNR’s proposals to key groups included no mention of funding – that will be up to Walker and the Legislature.

Said Walker communications director Chris Schrimpf: “If legislators want to keep it, the key will be legislators finding the money to pay for it.”

I hope they will. Why? Ensuring that communities maintain viable recycling programs is simply the right thing to do, both for the environment and for taxpayers — taxpayers who were facing the ridiculous conundrum of being forced by the state to continue recycling paper, plastic and cans without the state doing its part to help taxpayers deliver on that requirement.

We already pay a “tipping fee” to send our trash to landfills. The state then sends some of that money back to communities to help with recycling … and should continue to do so.

South Milwaukee is getting more than $120,000 from the state to help with recycling programs this year. Taking away that money has repercussions.

1 Comment

Filed under State Budget