Tag Archives: Mayzik

Holding the Line: Details on the Proposed 2011 South Milwaukee City Budget

The proposed 2011 city budget is available, and I feel good about it. I think you will too.

Before I get into the details, let me say thanks to City Administrator Tami Mayzik, City Clerk Jim Shelenske, Mayor Tom Zepecki, Finance Committee Chairman Pat Stoner and the department heads for all of their hard work in coming up with what I think is a sensible, fair and thoughtful budget — one that avoids much of the pain being felt by other communities, the county and state.

So here is some of the key information:

  • The 2011 executive budget includes a tax levy increase of 1.95% — below the state-imposed city levy limit increase of 3%. The proposed city levy is $10,196,526, compared to the 2010 budget of $10,001,640.
  • Total expenditures are projected to increase 0.6% from $19,043,365 to $19,158,448. This includes a 2% salary increase for union and non-represented employees (after no increase in 2010) and an 8.7% increase in health insurance premiums (even as we ask them to contribute 10% more to their premiums in 2011). Fuel budgets are also higher, and the fire hydrant rental fee — which the city pays to the Water Utility — is increasing 35% due to the water rate increase. We’re also budgeting for the purchase and maintenance of an emergency alert system in 2011, something I have pushed for as a way to keep residents better informed during situations like the flooding and water main break emergencies of the past year. One key reduction in expenses is our debt service payment, since the city did not do a borrowing in 2010.
  • Total revenues are projected to decrease 0.2% to $9,750,378 from $9,769,739. Our state shared revenue payment is expected to remain the same as 2010, our transportation aids will increase by $63,000 and our connecting street payments will remain close to the same as this year. We’re also anticipating a reduction in municipal court revenues in 2011 due to the struggling economy.
  • One significant revenue source, again, will be an expenditure restraint payment from the state for keeping spending increases below a certain threshold, for us 3% . The projected amount of this payment is $347,907. For purposes of this payment, our expenditure increase is 2.23% for 2011 — a number that gets to our “general fund” spending and does not factor in paramedic expenditures and debt service costs.
  • The proposed budget also balances thanks in part to a transfer of $160,000 from the city’s “rainy-day” non-lapsing fund. This is the second straight year we’ll be shifting money from this fund to cover our budget, and it’s in large part due to continued abysmal rates of return on our investment income. As investment returns rebound (hopefully some day soon) we likely won’t have to continue these transfers. Until then, I am OK with it.
  • Staffing levels remain the same as in 2010. We’re also adding an engineering intern to allow us to continue our sidewalk maintenance program.

You can see the draft budget on the city website here.

One point to keep in mind: Tax rate information is not yet available and won’t be until later in November. I’ll pass on that information when I know it, and that will allow you to calculate your estimated city tax bill for your property.

So, what’s next? The City Council held a budget information session on Wednesday and voted to published the proposed “executive” budget in the local newspaper. That will be done on Thursday, Nov. 4. A budget public hearing is scheduled for Monday, Nov. 29, at City Hall, and the City Council is expected to adopt the budget at its meeting the following night.

In the meantime, I’ll keep you posted on any new details that come up. Keep in mind that this is still a proposed budget, so the final numbers could, and likely will, change as we get a better handle on final 2010 revenues and expenses.

Of course, I’d like to know what you think of the proposed budget. Vote in the poll on the right-hand side of this page, post your comments below, and contact me anytime.

7 Comments

Filed under 2011 Budget

An Update on the 2010 Budget

Yes, there is some pain in the 2010 South Milwaukee city budget. But, thanks to the efforts of our administration, staff, department heads and the Finance Committee, things are looking as good as can be expected for next year.

That’s great news for taxpayers.

We had a Finance Committee meeting to discuss the proposed executive budget last week. Among the highlights:

  • The overall increase from the 2009 budget to the 2010 executive budget is $291,295, including debt service.
  • The executive budget meets the state-imposed levy limit (3 percent) with an increase of approximately 2.95 percent.
  • A recommended $250,000 fund transfer from the city’s “non-lapsing fund” will make up more than half of the estimated $400,000-plus budget shortfall we’ve been projecting.
  • The rest will primarily come as the city does not fill three open positions — a street department laborer, a public health nurse and an engineering department employee.
  • Interest income may actually come in lower than projected, even from a month ago. We are now projecting $100,000 in interest income in 2010, as opposed to $150,000 earlier in the budget process.
  • Also driving the initial shortfall were a $106,000 reduction in state shared revenue, a $60,000 increase in the “tipping fee” charged for waste disposal and $50,000 in increased expense for snow and ice removal.

City Administrator Tami Mayzik pointed out — and I agree — that while you should be hesitant to rely on a fund transfer to fill a budget hole, it is warranted in this case. The thought is investment interest rates will not stay this low forever, and once they increase, the lost revenue from those investments will rebound. Let’s hope that is in 2010 and not 2011.

You can check out the proposed 2010 budget out on the city website here. And you still have a chance to have your voice heard on the budget at these upcoming meetings:

  • The City Council will hold a budget public hearing at 6 p.m. on Monday, November 30.
  • The Council will consider adopting the budget at its meeting at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, December 1.

Again, thanks to everyone for their hard work in putting together this difficult budget … and for explaining some of the intricacies to this first-term alderman.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized