Category Archives: State Lawmakers

Standing Up For Local Control

I enjoyed presenting at the South Milwaukee Education Association’s state budget forum on Tuesday, and I want to thank the more than 80 folks who turned out (and the organizers who invited me).

It was an informative discussion and debate that I hope was a learning experience for attendees. It certainly was for me, thanks to the dialog throughout the night.

My message? It’s the same one I’d deliver to any crowd, liberal or conservative: Municipalities share many of the challenges school districts do. We feel the same pain when it comes to spending what it takes to deliver the services taxpayers expect and deserve.

State mandates make this more difficult than ever. Simply, I hate being told what to do, and it needs to stop.

This was the focus of my remark Tuesday.

The state has enough problems of its own than to inject itself into what should be local issues like how much we can raise in property taxes or where our city workers can live or what we can and can’t negotiate with our public employee unions. Indeed, those three examples — levy limits, residency restrictions and Act 10 — are mandates that impact what we do as a city every day. There are others.

All taxpayers feel this to some degree.

Consider levy limits.

The state limits how much communities can raise in property taxes in a given year, essentially capping levy increases at the amount of new local construction. And in an already-developed city like South Milwaukee, that has been around 1 or 2 percent, or less, in most years – barely inflation, if that. In other words, for a city that runs as efficiently as ours, doing more with less already, the state has made it difficult to fund even the same level of services year over year.

Costs go up … but how can you factor those in when your budgets can barely grow?

So we continue to do our best, making do thanks to the hard work of our city employees, from the administration to the front lines, dealing with the day-to-day ramifications of legislation authored and decided by politicians 90 miles away.

Am I arguing to raise taxes? Of course not. I’m proud of the low-levy-increase budgets the City Council has passed in recent years, and we need to continue that focus on frugality.

My point, instead, is this: No matter where you stand on any of these mandates – and I actually favor some of the more recent ones, including relaxed residency and Milwaukee County Board reforms — these should be local issues, decided by local leaders.

I hope we can all agree on that.

There seemed to be strong agreement on Tuesday night, when I left attendees with a request to get involved.

How? Contact your legislators, and the member of the Joint Finance Committee, as they hammer out the 2013-15 budget details. Let them know where you stand on key issues in the state budget – issues like public education funding and the state mandates that have their biggest impacts on the local level.

Become part of the debate at the local level, too. Attend a city council meeting or three. Learn the issues. Vote. Post something on NOW. Even comment on this blog. Stay on top of the key issues facing our city … and make your voices heard.

1 Comment

Filed under State Budget, State Lawmakers

Good Turnout, Informative Debate At South Milwaukee’s County Board Restructuring Meeting

An estimated 200 people attended Milwaukee County Supervisor Pat Jursik’s public information meeting on proposed Milwaukee County Board restructuring legislation — and I’m glad I was one of them.

I found the event informative, as it provided a deep dive on the Assembly and Senate bills calling for a referendum to reduce the role (and pay) of supervisors to part-time, reduce the board’s operating budget (i.e., staff) and transfer some powers to the county executive, among other changes.

The point-counterpoint debate between Rep. Joe Sanfelippo, the former supervisor and author of the Assembly bill, and Supervisor Theo Lipscomb Jr., who spoke out against most of the proposals in the legislation, was also lively and thought-provoking. And the question-and-answer/comment section added to the meeting as well.

I left the South Milwaukee Performing Arts Center much more educated on this important issue — as did Pat, who pledged to take all that she heard into consideration in formulating her opinion on the issue of county board restructuring.

I credit Pat for once again showing her commitment to keeping constituents informed on key issues, and for taking a measured approach to her approach on this topic. I also thank the two panelists for the robust debate — and having the courage to sit in front of a room of 200 people and argue their case.

Both had reasonable and strong arguments for their positions, and I left feeling like the best solution — as it so often is — is somewhere in the middle … somewhere between the status quo and the sweeping changes proposed by Sanfelippo.

Of course, I’d like to know what you think. Here is the presentation from the meeting. Read it … and vote in my new poll!

1 Comment

Filed under Milwaukee County, State Budget, State Lawmakers

Educate Your Lawmakers: South Milwaukee School Leaders Want Your Help In Speaking Out Against Walker’s Budget (And For Public Schools)

Update: Vote in the new poll!

Gov. Scott Walker’s proposed 2013-15 budget is not a pretty one for South Milwaukee schools — and the district wants you to contact local legislators and other lawmakers to tell them about it.

From a memo posted on the school district website

The Governor’s budget for 2013-15 is yet another reduction to K-12 public education, in a period where there is over $1.7 billion of new funds available to allocate in the state budget. 

  • The Governor is proposing that the available funds in the State budget be allocated to expand the number and cost of voucher and charter schools in Wisconsin – this money reduces the amount available to public schools.
  • The Governor has allocated a 1% increase in state aid to K-12 education, but this is NOT ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR SCHOOLS. This is only a property tax reduction. The Governor must allow school districts to increase the revenue limit. An increase in revenue limits enables schools to sustain programs whereas the state aid in the Governor’s budget is only going to provide property tax relief.
  • Tell the legislators that public schools need a per pupil increase to the revenue limit.

The upshot? The South Milwaukee School District would face a more than $365,000 budget deficit if Walker’s budget passes. That would surely mean cuts for a district that has already dealt with more than its fair share.

Preliminary budget recommendations are expected on March 20. In the meantime, hopefully the state funding scenario will improve — although I certainly have my doubts.

It’s clear Gov. Walker and many Republicans have decided to place their bet with voucher schools … and not with public education. As the proud parent of two Rawson Elementary students, I think that’s wrong. Fix public education. Invest in it. Fund it properly. Don’t encourage its demise in favor of a voucher system that has yet to demonstrate results (and may never do so).

You can learn more about the district’s budget plight on this page on its website. As you do that, I think I’m going to call my legislators … and I encourage you to do the same.

16 Comments

Filed under Schools, State Budget, State Lawmakers

Mining Controversy: Honadel One Of Bill’s Authors

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel is at the center of the first big debate in the new legislature — the effort to pass a new mining bill.

Honadel is one of four authors of the Assembly bill. Check out the press release here. From it:

“Not only will this provide family-supporting jobs in northern Wisconsin, but it will have a direct impact on businesses in the Milwaukee area such as Caterpillar and Joy Global,” Rep. Mark Honadel (R-South Milwaukee) said.

Of course, not everyone agrees with Honadel, who is also quoted in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel and Associated Press stories. South Shore state Sen. Chris Larson is among those concerned with the proposed bill. His quote in this story:

“They have the votes to do whatever it is that they want,” added Senate Minority Leader Chris Larson, D-Milwaukee. “But if they go in another partisan direction, if they continue down the wrong path that they did the last two years, it’s going to show that we’re not going to have jobs, we’re going to continue to be divided and the people of Wisconsin are going to be frustrated.”

Of course, I’d like to know what you think about the mining bill. Post you comments below.

Me? I’m concerned that it bends too much toward mining companies. The concerns I raised last summer are still valid, and this line in today’s Journal Sentinel story really concerns me: “The bill would also allow for the filling in of a lake bed in some circumstances and allows for the destruction of wetlands, if the loss is made up elsewhere in ceded territories of northern Wisconsin.”

Really? That strikes me as a bridge too far. I’m no tree hugger, but I hope any mining bill maintains sensible environmental protections. Provisions like that don’t strike me as sensible.

5 Comments

Filed under State Lawmakers

Larson Profiled In Journal Sentinel

South Shore state Sen. Chris Larson was on the front page of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel this morning in what was a pretty positive profile.

Check it out here. From it …

At the age of 32, a time when most politicians are just getting started, he finds himself in the middle of a quick political rise.

His youth is an asset, but it could also be a liability.

He can dare to dream and win – he won a Milwaukee County supervisor position in 2008, knocked off a Democratic incumbent to take a Senate seat in 2010 and guided a new generation of Democrats to victories in 2012.

But he could still stumble and fail – three of his Democratic colleagues blew off a caucus meeting in Madison last week, and he faces the prospect of a long season of defeats in a state where Republicans hold the governorship and both houses of the Legislature.

Yet if other more seasoned politicians underestimate him – and some apparently, do – Larson doesn’t appear to be too bothered.

“You know what, I’ve always been an underdog,” he says. “I think it’s greatly appropriate because I like to fight for the underdog.”

Leave a comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

More On Larson’s Selection As Minority Leader

State Sen. Chris Larson — newly chosen as the Senate’s minority leader — has published a new Larson Report, with the headline “Ready To Tackle State Challenges As Democratic Leader.”

From it …

I am humbled by the confidence my fellow senators have in me by electing me their leader. With the elections complete, we have an opportunity to stop divide-and-conquer politics and start working responsibly across the aisle to serve all Wisconsinites. Wisconsin voters spoke loud and clear on November 6. They want Democratic and Republican lawmakers to move the state forward with programs and policies that reflect our shared Wisconsin values.

For the sake of Wisconsin’s future, I encourage members of the Legislature to work together as Wisconsinites by casting off our partisan labels and setting aside any politically divisive agendas.

See the full email here — and his list of our “immediate priorities.”

And here is the press release.

Also, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has more details on some of the behind-the-scenes lobbying that did (or didn’t) happen as part of the selection.

9 Comments

Filed under State Lawmakers

News From Our State Legislators

It’s been a busy few weeks in Madison, and South Milwaukee’s two state lawmakers are weighing in on some of the key issues.

Rep. Mark Honadel put out a press release on Thursday about the positive state jobs news. From it:

“Economic recovery has been my top priority in the State Assembly.  The policies we have enacted this session have provided certainty for job creators and created a more stable business environment.”

Meanwhile, Sen. Chris Larson put out this press release on the mining bill and made it the subject of his latest Larson Report. Larson also put out this press release this week on what he is calling the “school voucher loophole.”

Also, Larson was quoted this week in a WISN-TV story about politicians on Twitter

Of course, I’d like to know what you think of these. Post your comments!

Leave a comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

Larson Holding Sunday Office Hours In Oak Creek

State Sen. Chris Larson is holding open “office hours” from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on Sunday at the Falk Park pavilion in Oak Creek.

From the email blast Larson sent out:

This is your chance to talk in person about any questions, concerns or opinions you might have about our community or state. No appointment necessary. Feel free to call my office for additional information. 

You can also join me at the Bay View Winter Blast afterward. This community festival features musical entertainment, family activities, and community group stands. Winter Blast also hosts Bay View’ s only chili cook-off between multiple neighborhood restaurants.

Falk Park is at 2013 W. Rawson Ave., and Winter Blast is at the South Shore Park Pavilion.

Leave a comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

New State Post For Sullivan

Gov. Scott Walker’s newest adviser is former Bucyrus CEO Tim Sullivan.

Sullivan will head Walker’s office of business development, it was announced Thursday.

Check out coverage in the Journal Sentinel and the Business Journal, and here is the press release.

From the release:

Job creators from all across Wisconsin have identified a skills gap between the jobs they have available and the workers applying to fill them. Manufacturers, in particular, identify this skills gap as one of the top barriers to business growth. Similarly, our technical colleges report difficulty in filling many of their manufacturing training courses with qualified students. That’s why Governor Walker has worked closely with the Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation and the Department of Workforce Development on ongoing strategies for tackling the problem.

To help develop and drive these strategies across a variety of agencies and institutions, the Administration is utilizing the expertise of a consultant who brings a track record of private sector success and vast experience and understanding of the workforce development issues job creators look at when deciding where to grow.

As Special Consultant for Business and Workforce Development, Sullivan will be help identify barriers to business development and job growth in Wisconsin. He will focus especially on workforce, employment environment, and policy issues. He will also help identify and cultivate business prospects for expansion and relocation to Wisconsin.

Sullivan will also head up the Office of Business Development, serve as Chairman of the Council on Workforce Investment and as member of the College and Workforce Readiness Council. Sullivan is serving the state as a volunteer.

Leave a comment

Filed under Local Business, State Lawmakers

Valuable Cost-Benefit Analysis Or Unnecessary Paperwork?

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel has reportedly floated a bill in the Assembly that would remove requirements that the Department of Transportation engage in a cost-benefit analysis on engineering services that exceed $25,000.

The proposed measure would only require a yearly report on the cost of those services.

Learn more in this WISC-TV story. From it:

Rep. Mark Honadel, R-South Milwaukee, wants to get rid of required cost-benefit analysis forms the DOT has to fill out on nearly every engineering project. The forms show the estimated difference between the cost of state engineers and private contractors. Honadel wants to have the DOT only do a year-end report on that comparison.

A WISC-TV investigation last year found the DOT spending millions more for outside consultants instead of state engineers, based on these forms.

Honadel said he wants to eliminate the paperwork, following up on the Governor’s Waste, Fraud and Abuse Commission report that found faults with the state’s cost-benefit analysis reporting.

“The commission discovered that these reports are time consuming, costly, have a questionable value, and significant DOT staff time is dedicated to producing between 200 and 400 reports a year,” said Honadel at an Assembly Transportation Committee hearing Tuesday.

DOT officials said they are supportive of the proposal, saying the forms now only provide them with an “educated guess” of costs.

Democratic lawmakers and others have spoken about against the bill, including Rep. Mark Pocan and Mark Klipstein, president of the State Engineering Association.

Pocan’s quote: “This bill doesn’t make fiscal sense. The Walker administration admits in the Waste, Fraud and Abuse report we spend too much money on outsourcing engineering for transportation projects. Yet, Republicans are trying to eliminate mandatory cost-benefit analysis intended to help the Department of Transportation determine if they should outsource projects in the first place.

“In 2009, an audit by the Legislative Audit Bureau proved in many instances, the state could have saved money had it utilized qualified state engineers rather than contracting out some of its engineering work. Ironically, this bill will open the door for additional costs.”

Quick aside: Honadel has also removed his support for a bill that could lead to mixed martial art fights being held in more than 1,200 towns in the state. Check out the OnMilwaukee.com story here.

Leave a comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

Honadel’s “Wisconsin Wins” Closer To Passage

Update: And here is a statement from Gov. Scott Walker.

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel’s “Wisconsin Wins” unemployed worker job training initiative has passed through key Senate and Assembly committees.

Check out the press release from Sen. Van Wangaard, the Republican sponsor of the Senate version of the bill, on WisPolitics.com here. From it:

“Wisconsin Wins” is a pilot program under which employers would apply to the Department of Workforce Development to offer six-week employer-specific training to unemployed workers. Unemployed individuals who participate in the program will receive an additional $75 stipend for each week they participate. If the worker and employer are a good fit, the worker should have a full-time job at the end of the six weeks. The program is based on a successful Georgia program called “Georgia Works.” “Wisconsin Wins” is one of the centerpieces of Governor Walker’s “Wisconsin Working” agenda.

The bill must still get Joint Finance Committee and full Senate and Assembly approval. I’ll keep you posted.

1 Comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

Why Honadel Supports The Mining Bill

Update: Not surprisingly, the Assembly passed the bill on a party line vote. We’ll see what the Senate does. 

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel has an edidtorial in Oak Creek Patch explaining his support for the mining reform bill making its way through the legislature.

Check it out here. From it:

The bill to be considered by the State Assembly this week reforms the process by establishing clear and achievable standards to issue a permit for an iron ore mine. We can pass legislation that forms a reasonable process for active mining while still protecting our environment.

The result of encouraging the mining industry to come back to Wisconsin will mean thousands of jobs and new investment in our state. Jobs will be created around the state from Iron and Ashland Counties where the mine would be located to southeastern Wisconsin where mining equipment is manufactured. 

The bill is expected to go to an Assembly vote today (and will surely pass). I will keep you posted.

In the meantime, I’d like to know what you think. Post your comments below!

3 Comments

Filed under State Lawmakers

Mining Bill Has A Fan In Honadel … Me? Not Sure

The long-awaited bill that would streamline the approval process for new mines in Wisconsin has finally seen the light of day — and count South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel as a supporter.

“Our state flag bears a miner on it,” he said in a press release. “That’s not only our heritage, but it must be our future too. To ignore the potential of thousands of good-paying jobs would do a disservice to the people of Wisconsin.”

Learn more about the bill here and here.

At first glance, I absolutely like parts of it. I think a shorter, more-defined approval process is a good thing becuase I do think bureaucracy can unnecessarily slow projects like this down — and kill them altogether. Sometimes, government can’t get out of the way.

But I also worry that, with the compressed timeline and the proposed elimination of “contested case hearings,” mining projects may not get proper due diligence. Plus, the bill “would ease numerous existing restrictions on protections for wetlands, groundwater, lakes, rivers and streams,” according to the Journal Sentinel.

State Sen. Chris Larson also interestingly points out in his new Larson Report that the bill was not assigned to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee, but rather to the Assembly Committee on Jobs, Economy and Small Business. This I am sure is a reflection of the attempt to shift the debate on bills like this from a focus on environmental impacts to “jobs, jobs, jobs.” And it appears to be working.

But at what cost, jobs? I want to see more job creation as much as anyone, but there has to be a balance between appropriate regulation and the economics of a proposed mine.

One thing I definitely do not support about this legislation is the process lawmakers seem to be taking to pass it. A public hearing on the bill is planned for 10 a.m. Wednesday at Wisconsin State Fair Park in West Allis — just six days after it was introduced. This despite being worked on for months behind closed doors in the legislature.

I think that’s wrong. This bill deserves, demands, more careful consideration than what is being offered.

As for details of the bill itself, I guess I’ll wait and see.

1 Comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

Unique Approach: Honadel’s “Wisconsin Wins” Job Training Initiative Introduced

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel and his counterpart in the Senate, Sen. Van Wanggaard (R-Racine), have introduced a bill that gives unemployed job seekers a “tryout period” with prospective employers while still receiving unemployment benefits.

Check out the press release here.

And here is my previous post on this.

It’s an interesting concept and unique approach to matching unemployed workers with jobs. I hope it gets strong consideration.

Either way, it’s just refreshing to see a state legislator introduce a bill focused on jobs, a departure from the often non-job-focused bills that framed the recently concluded special “jobs” session. This editorial from the Appleton Post-Crescent put it well.

I’ll keep you posted as this moves through the legislature.

1 Comment

Filed under State Lawmakers

Report: Honadel Will Seek To End Nuclear Moratorium

South Milwaukee Rep. Mark Honadel wants to end the moratorium on the construction of new nuclear power plants in Wisconsin, and as chairman of the Assembly’s Committee on Energy and Utilities, he plans to introduce legislation to that effect next spring.

That is according to a story at WisBusiness.com. From it:

No new nuclear plants have been built in Wisconsin in more than 35 years. Wisconsin law requires that a federal nuclear waste repository must be available and a new plant must be “economically advantageous to ratepayers” before it can be approved by the state Public Service Commission.

“As a legislator, I don’t believe any type of energy should be off the table,” said Honadel, speaking outside a two-day conference at the UW-Madison’s Fluno Center.

The gathering is focused on the future of nuclear power following the March accident at the Fukushima Daiichi plant in Japan that resulted from an earthquake and subsequent tsunami.

Honadel said he believes there is too much concern about the safety of nuclear power plants.

“If you look at the number of fatalities they have caused compared to auto accidents and other risks, it’s miniscule,” he said.

Of course, not everyone agrees with this, as you can see in the story. And I certainly have my concerns.

Of course, I wonder what you think. Post your comments below!

3 Comments

Filed under State Lawmakers